In State v. McCree, the 12th Appellate District of Ohio upheld the 17 + 6 month sentence for trafficking cocaine + possession of cocaine. The sentences were imposed consecutively, meaning that the sentence was effectively a 23 month sentence.
The defendant claimed that the search was unlawful because he verbally refused consent. However, the court noted that he subsequently consented to the search by his actions and, therefore, found that the evidence uncovered in the search was admissible.
Popular Posts
-
Ryan Widmer, convicted in the drowning death of his wife, previously brought a motion for a new trial related to accusations, including othe...
-
The AP is reporting that Governor Kasich may propose the sale of 5 prisons to private operators. A sale of the prisons would purportedly ra...
-
Bruce Sims was wanted for allegedly raping a minor just after midnight on Tuesday, April 19, 2011. He voluntarily turned himself in later t...
-
Cory Israel was sentenced to 43 years as an accomplice to a rape and kidnapping of a Middletown woman. He appealed, claiming that the eviden...
-
In State v. Roy , the 12th Appellate District of Ohio reversed a sentencing pursuant to Johnson . The appellate court found that the traffic...
-
The Twelfth Circuit upheld the 3 year sentence of Cooper. Cooper was charged with four counts of rape and four counts of felonious sexual ba...
-
In State v. McCree , the 12th Appellate District of Ohio upheld the 17 + 6 month sentence for trafficking cocaine + possession of cocaine. T...
-
Typically, Ohio law prohibits a defendant from being sentenced for two crimes if the underlying conduct is the same for both crimes and if t...
-
A grand jury indicted Gerth on 12 counts, including 2 counts of murder, related to the high-speed chase that killed two individuals. Gerth ...
-
Kimball Perry reports that a University of Cincinnati student was sentenced to jail for five years as a result of a disturbing choking incid...
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment