In State v. McCree, the 12th Appellate District of Ohio upheld the 17 + 6 month sentence for trafficking cocaine + possession of cocaine. The sentences were imposed consecutively, meaning that the sentence was effectively a 23 month sentence.
The defendant claimed that the search was unlawful because he verbally refused consent. However, the court noted that he subsequently consented to the search by his actions and, therefore, found that the evidence uncovered in the search was admissible.
Popular Posts
-
The AP is reporting that Governor Kasich may propose the sale of 5 prisons to private operators. A sale of the prisons would purportedly ra...
-
Cory Israel was sentenced to 43 years as an accomplice to a rape and kidnapping of a Middletown woman. He appealed, claiming that the eviden...
-
The Twelfth District Court of Appeals of Ohio handed down another opinion regarding allied offenses . We previously explained allied offense...
-
Typically, Ohio law prohibits a defendant from being sentenced for two crimes if the underlying conduct is the same for both crimes and if t...
-
NKY.com is reporting about the floating restaurant in Covington last night. Ruby's Riverfront restaurant floated away as a result of th...
-
Ryan Widmer, convicted in the drowning death of his wife, previously brought a motion for a new trial related to accusations, including othe...
-
Dawn Dixon, accused of stealing a minivan with a 4-year-old child inside, was hospitalized for unknown reasons while charges were pending ag...
-
We just couldn't help but mention Charlie Sheen's video rantings . He's wearing a Cincinnati Reds shirt (Ohio), although there...
-
Pursuant to R.C. 2945.71, defendants in Ohio have a right to a trial within 45 days. The issue in State v. Ignat, at the 12th District Cour...
-
Tiffani Calise, charged with murdering an infant that she was babysitting, is awaiting trial in jail. She is pregnant, and requested a mate...
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment